 | United States. Supreme Court - 1926 - 892 psl.
...in question, are regulations of th<> remedy, and not of the right to lands. If those acts so changed the nature and extent of existing remedies as materially...violation of the compact as if they directly overturned hie rights and interests." These conclusions were adhered to upon a rehearing, and reaffirmed in the... | |
 | 1878 - 542 psl.
...Kentucky now in question are regulations of the remedy and not of Hi'- right to the lands. If these acts so change the nature and extent of existing remedies...just as much a violation of the compact as if they overturned his rights and interests." •• One of the tests that a contract has been Impaired is... | |
 | 1892 - 1278 psl.
...extent of existing remedies as materially tu impair the rights and Interests of the owner, they ure just as much a violation of the compact as if they directly overturned his rights and interests. "" Upon the same principle it was held in McOacken v. Hay ward, 2 How. 608, that a statute prohibiting... | |
 | 1889 - 1232 psl.
...extent and within proper bounds, may regulate the remedy, yet, if by subsequent enactment it so changes the nature and extent of existing remedies as materially to impair the rights and interests of a party in a contract, this is as much a violation of the compact as if it absolutely destroyed his... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1884 - 1022 psl.
...Kentucky now in question are regulations of tbe remedy, and not of the right to the lands. If these Acts so change the nature and extent of existing remedies...the rights and interests of the owner, they are just is much a violation of the compact as if they overturned his rights and interests." In Branson v. Kinzie,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1911 - 1180 psl.
...the right to lands. If these acts so change the nature and extent of existing remedies as terially to impair the rights and interests of the owner, they...directly overturned his rights and interests." The above question arose under the compact between Virginia and Kentucky, which dedared, "that all private... | |
 | Mississippi. Supreme Court - 1845 - 896 psl.
...Kentucky, now in question, are regulations of the remedy and not of the rights to the lands. If those acts so change the nature and extent of existing remedies, as materially to impair the interests and rights of the owner, they are just as much a violation of the compact as if they directly... | |
 | California. Supreme Court - 1906 - 730 psl.
...directly on the contract itself; in either case it is prohibited by the Constitution." " If these acts so change the nature and extent of existing remedies...they directly overturned his rights and interests." " But it is manifest that the obligation of the contract, and the rights of a party under it, may,... | |
 | David P. Currie - 1992 - 518 psl.
...the point more modestly in reaching the same result in 1821 , before the rehearing: "If those acts so change the nature and extent of existing remedies,...they directly overturned his rights and interests." Id. at 17. Green was significant also for its conclusion that a compact between Virginia and Kentucky... | |
 | California. Supreme Court - 1906 - 786 psl.
...change the nature and extent of existing remedies, aa materially to impair the rights and interest of the owner, they are just as much a violation of...they directly overturned his rights and interests." In Branson v. Kinzie (1 How. 311) the same Court cites with approbation the opinion in Green T. Biddle,... | |
| |
It is no answer, that the acts of Kentucky now in question are regulations of the remedy, and not of the right to the lands. If these acts so change the nature and extent of existing remedies as materially to impair the rights and interests of the owner,... 
