 The assent of the States, in their sovereign capacity, is implied in calling a convention, and thus submitting that instrument to the people. But the people were at perfect liberty to accept or reject it; and their act was final. It required not the affirmance,...  The Century Illustrated Monthly Magazine - 632 psl.redagavo - 1894Visos knygos peržiūra - Apie šią knygą
 | Vermont. Supreme Court - 1922 - 632 psl.
...Constitution derives its whole authority; that the assent of the states, in the sovereign capacity, is implied in calling a convention, and thus submitting...liberty to accept or reject it, and their act was final; that the Constitution, when thus adopted, was of complete obligation, and bound the state sovereignties... | |
 | Vermont Historical Society - 1921 - 328 psl.
...Constitution derives its whole authority; that the assent of the states, in the sovereign capacity, is implied in calling a convention, and thus submitting...liberty to accept or reject it, and their act was final ; that the Constitution, when thus adopted, was of complete obligation, and bound the state sovereignties;... | |
 | 1920 - 540 psl.
...liberty to themselves and to their posterity. ' The assent of the States in their sovereign capacity, is implied in calling a Convention, and thus submitting...governments. The constitution, when thus adopted, was of complete obligation, and bound the State sovereignties." "It has been said, that the people had... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1969 - 1778 psl.
...liberty to themselves and to their posterity." The assent of the states, in their sovereign capacity, is implied, in calling a convention, and thus submitting...governments. The Constitution, when thus adopted, was of complete obligation, and bound the state sovereignties. It has been said, that the people had already... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1969 - 1080 psl.
...to their posteritj assent of the states, in their sovereign capacity, is implied, in calling a conv and thus submitting that instrument to the people. But the people were at liberty to accept or reject it ; and their act was final. It required not the affir and could not be... | |
 | George Wescott Carey - 1994 - 220 psl.
...state governments." Marshall concedes that "the assent of the states, in their sovereign capacity, is implied in calling a convention, and thus submitting that instrument to the people." "But," he adds, it was "the people," not the states, who "were at perfect liberty to accept or reject it;... | |
 | Wayne D. Moore - 1998 - 312 psl.
...whole authority." He conceded that "[t]he assent of the states, in their sovereign capacity, [was) implied, in calling a convention, and thus submitting that instrument to the people." He also denied that the people's having acted "in their states" made their approval "measures of the... | |
 | Elizabeth Kelley Bauer - 1999 - 402 psl.
...conventions, and thus submitting the new scheme of government to the people. But the people of each state were at perfect liberty to accept or reject it, and their act was final. The Constitution required not the affirmance of the state governments, nor could it be negatived by... | |
 | Richard M Battistoni - 2000 - 198 psl.
...liberty to themselves and to their posterity." The assent of the States in their sovereign capacity is implied in calling a convention, and thus submitting...Governments. The Constitution, when thus adopted, was of complete obligation, and bound the State sovereignties. This Government is acknowledged by all to... | |
| |
