 | Joseph Story - 1873 - 786 psl.
...never be exercised by the people themselves, but must be placed in the hands of agents, or lie dormant. We know of no rule for construing the extent of such...in connection with the purposes for which they were conferred."1 1 See also Id. 222, and Mr. Chief Justice Marshall's opinion in Ogden v. Saunders, 12... | |
 | 1874 - 500 psl.
...never be exercised by the people themselves, but must be placed in the hands of agents or lie dormant. We know of no rule for construing the extent of such...connection with the purposes for which they were conferred. 97 This general view of the origin, nature, and extent of the powers of Congress, and the clear and... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate - 1874 - 554 psl.
...but must be placed in the hands of agents or liedormant. We know of no rule for coustruingtbeextentof such powers other than is given by the language of...with the purposes for which they were conferred." This general view of the origin, nature, and extent of the powers of Congress, and the clear and authoritative... | |
 | Maine - 1875 - 364 psl.
...the powers conferred by the constitution, other than is given by the language of the instrument that confers them, taken in connection with the purposes for which they were conferred." It will not answer to strain, subordinate and dwarf the constitution of this State. That instrument... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1904 - 598 psl.
...great influence in the interpretation. ' ' We know of no rule, ' ' says Mr. Chief Justice Marshall, ' ' for construing the extent of such powers, other than...with the purposes for which they were conferred.." Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 189, 6 L. Ed. 23. Again, in this case my Brother, referring to the word... | |
 | Orlando Bump - 1878 - 474 psl.
...exercised by the people themselves, but must be placed in the hands of agents or lie dormant. There is no rule for construing the extent of such powers other...taken in connection with the purposes for which they are conferred. The powers are not to be construed strictly. Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1. In a general... | |
 | 1917 - 2042 psl.
...settled by the federal judiciary? In Gibbon v. Ogdeu, 9 Wheat. 188, 6 L. Ed. i!3, Marshall, CJ, says: 'We know of no rule for construing the extent of such...with the purposes for which they were conferred.' Then, speaking of the misapplication of the doctrine of strict construction, in language which seems... | |
 | 1917 - 1038 psl.
...settled by the federal judiciary? In Gibbon v. Ogdeii, 9 Wheat. 188, 6 L. Ed. 23. Marshall, CJ, says: 'We know of no rule for construing the extent of such...with the purposes for which they were conferred.' Then, speaking of the misapplication of the doctrine of strict construction, in language which seems... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1882 - 798 psl.
...never be exercised by the people themselves, but must be placed in the hands of agents, or lie dormant. We know of no rule for construing the extent of such...connection with the purposes for which they were conferred. The words are: " Congress shall have power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the... | |
 | 1885 - 890 psl.
...never be exercised bv the people themselves, but must be placed in the hands of agents, or lie dormant. We know of no rule for construing the extent of such...connection with the purposes for which they were conferred. The words are: "Congress shall have power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the... | |
| |
We know of no rule for construing the extent of such powers, other than is given by the language of the instrument which confers them, taken in connection with the purposes for which they were conferred. The words are : " Congress shall have power to... 
