 On the other hand, the agency of domination does not reside in the one who speaks (for it is he who is constrained), but in the one who listens and says nothing; not in the one who knows and answers, but in the one who questions and is not supposed to...  Stories and Portraits of the Self - 9 psl.redagavo - 2007 - 332 psl.Ribota peržiūra - Apie šią knygą
 | Jenny Sharpe - 212 psl.
..."the agency of domination does not reside in the one who speaks ifor it is he who is constrained), but in the one who listens and says nothing: not in...but in the one who questions and is not supposed to know."21 Since subaltern women do not have the same relationship to "voice-agency" as the feminist... | |
 | Rosalyn Diprose - 1994 - 172 psl.
...suggests: the agency of domination does not reside in the one who speaks (for it is he who is constrained) but in the one who listens and says nothing; not in the one who knows, but in the one who questions and is not supposed to know. And this discourse of truth finally takes... | |
 | William Marling - 1998 - 329 psl.
...the pleasure that animated it" (63). The agency of domination in this relationship "does not reside in the one who speaks, but in the one who listens and says nothing ... in the one who questions and is not supposed to know" (62). This entity reconstructed "in and around... | |
 | Carol Martin - 1996 - 336 psl.
...[T]he agency of domination does not reside in the one who speaks (for it is he who is constrained), but in the one who listens and says nothing; not in...the one who questions and is not supposed to know. (Michel Foucault 1978:64) Foucault is describing the power-knowledge fulcrum which sustains the Roman... | |
 | Gay Morris - 1996 - 362 psl.
..."the agency of domination does not reside in the one who speaks (for it is he who is constrained), but in the one who listens and says nothing; not in...the one who questions and is not supposed to know" (1984: 62). Foucault is discussing the confessional in relation to Catholicism prior to the Reformation,... | |
 | Carla Kaplan - 1996 - 251 psl.
...relations of confession] does not reside in the one who speaks (for it is he [sic] who is constrained), but in the one who listens and says nothing; not in...but in the one who questions and is not supposed to know."71 The ideal of a self-affirming dialogue (of an affirmed "self at all! ), on this account, could... | |
 | Carol Martin - 1996 - 348 psl.
...ITjhe ageney of domination does not reside in the one who speaks tfor it is he who is eonstrained). hut in the one who listens and says nothing; not in the one who knows and answers. hut in the one who questions and is not supposed to know. tMiehel Foueault 1978:64) Foueault is deserihing... | |
 | Giancarlo Maiorino - 1996 - 350 psl.
...but the authority who requires the confession," and that "the agency of domination does not reside in the one who speaks, but in the one who listens and says nothing" (I: 63). In Lazarillo de Tormes authority is vested in Vuestra Merced, who calls the discourse into... | |
 | Susan David Bernstein - 1997 - 226 psl.
...force of the THEORIZING CONFESSION confessor can be silent: "the agency of domination does not reside in the one who speaks . . . but in the one who listens and says nothing." Foucault suggests here that domination is complete when it requires no visible effort to reinforce... | |
 | Lisa Yoneyama - 1999 - 326 psl.
..."the agency of domination does not reside in the one who speaks (for it is he who is constrained), but in the one who listens and says nothing; not in...one who receives it, but in the one from whom it is wrested."8 The speaking subject is thus always doubly constituted as both the agent of speech and as... | |
| |
