Race and Racism in Continental PhilosophyRobert Bernasconi Indiana University Press, 2003-06-18 - 328 psl. The 15 original essays in Race and Racism in Continental Philosophy explore the resources that continental philosophy brings to debates about contemporary race theory and investigate the racism of some of Europe's most important thinkers. Attention is devoted to the influence of the work of W. E. B. Du Bois, Jean-Paul Sartre, Richard Wright, and Frantz Fanon. Questions about race in European philosophy -- especially in the work of Nietzsche, Heidegger, Lévi-Strauss, and Arendt -- are also considered. This volume provides an indispensable critical introduction to new perspectives on thinking about race and racism. |
Kiti leidimai - Peržiūrėti viską
Pagrindiniai terminai ir frazės
African Americans African philosophy Aimé Césaire alienation American anthropology Appiah Arendt argues become biological Black Skin blood body Bois's BSWM civilization claim Claude Lévi-Strauss colonial color complex conception of race consciousness Conservation of Races constituted Continental philosophy created critical critique decadence dialectic Douglass essay European existence fact Frantz Fanon French G. W. F. Hegel German Hegel Heidegger Heidegger's Henceforth human ideal identity ideology individual intellectual Jewish Lacan language Lévi-Strauss logic Malagasy Mannoni Martinican meaning Merleau-Ponty metaphysics mirror stage nation nature Nazi Negritude Negro Nietzsche Nietzsche's oppression political problem psychology question Race and Culture Race and History race theory racial racism reality Richard Wright Robert Bernasconi Sartre Sartre's schema sense social construction society soul spirit Suzanne Césaire thought tion trans Tropiques understanding unity University Press values violence Voegelin Volk W. E. B. Du Bois White Masks Wright writes York
Populiarios ištraukos
18 psl. - I need only remark that it is by no means unusual, upon comparing the thoughts which an author has expressed in regard to his subject, whether in ordinary conversation or in writing, to find that we understand him better than he has understood himself. As he has not sufficiently determined his concept, he has sometimes spoken, or even thought, in opposition to his own intention.