numbered 127. And thereafter other intermarried whites appealed generally, numbered 128. cil shall have power to make all laws and regulations which they shall deem necessary and proper for the good of the Nation, which shall not be contrary to this Constitution." Prior to 1855 certain white persons had The case is reported in 40 Ct. Cl. 411, where will be found an elaborate statement of the facts, including the acts of the Cher-married Cherokees, which had given rise to okee National Council, etc., bearing on the serious questions respecting the status of subject-matter. Mr. John J. Hemphill argued the cause, and, with Mr. K. S. Murchison, filed a brief on behalf of Cherokee citizens by blood. Mr. Edgar Smith argued the cause and filed a brief for the Cherokee Nation. Messrs. James S. Davenport and William T. Hutchings argued the cause and filed a brief on behalf of persons claiming rights in the Cherokee Nation by intermarriage. Mr. William Henry White also argued the cause, and, with Mr. A. E. L. Leckie, filed a brief on behalf of the intermarried whites. Mr. Chief Justice Fuller delivered the opinion of the court: Article 1 of the treaty of 1846 declared "that the lands now occupied by the Cher[81]okee Nation shall be secured to the whole Cherokee people for their common use and benefit" [9 Stat. at L. 871]; and article 4, that these lands "shall be and remain the common property of the whole Cherokee people." Section 2 of article 1 of the Cherokee Constitution (1839) provided that "the lands of the Cherokee Nation shall remain common property." The amendments of 1866 (art. 1, § 2) declared that the lands of the Cherokee Nation “shall remain common property until the National Council shall request the survey and allotment of the same, in accordance with the provisions of article 20 of the Treaty of 19th of July, 1866 [14 Stat. at L. 799], between the United States and the Cherokee Nation." This request was subsequently duly made and an allotment is taking place accordingly. these persons and the jurisdiction of the In these circumstances the Cherokee act of 1855 "regulating intermarriage with white men" was passed. Its purpose is plain and is disclosed by the preamble in these words: "Whereas the peace and prosperity of the Cherokee people require that, in the enforcement of the laws, the jurisdiction should be exercised over all persons whatever who may, from time to time, be privileged to reside within the territorial limits of this Nation, therefore," etc., etc. The act was administrative and aimed at subjecting the intermarried whites to the control and dominion of the Cherokee laws instead of leaving them responsible solely to the laws and authorities of the government of the United States. It contains nothing indicating the intention to confer property rights on intermarried whites. But in respect of the public domain, the court of claims, in the present case, because of the opinion in Cherokee Nation v. Journeycake. 155 U. S. 196, 39 L. ed. 120, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 55, assumed that the acquisition of citizenship under Cherokee laws carried the right to share therein, unless forbidden by sun legislation. And Mr. Chief Justice Nott, speaking for the court, said: "In 1874 the rapidly growing value of the Cherokee lands The Nation, under the treaties, possessed was becoming perceptible. On the one hand the right of local self-government with authere were white men who desired to marry thority to make such laws as it deemed into the tribe, and, mairying and residing necessary for the government and protection in the Nation, desire the rights and priviof persons and property within the country, leges of citizens; on the other hand, there belonging to its people, "or such persons as were white adventurers desiring to share in have connected themselves with them." the wealth of the Nation, soon, it was beTreaty, Dec. 29, 1835, art. 5, 7 Stat. at L. lieved, to become available to individual cit478. And § 14 of article 3 of the Cherokee izens. The public welfare might be benefited Constitution provideu: "The National Coun- | by allowing the one, and most certainly The intermarried whites have not acquired the right to share in the lands or funds of the Cherokee Nation by grant in express terms, but that right is claimed in virtue of an alleged citizenship in the Cherokee Nation derived from intermarriage under Cherokee laws. "Provided, also, that the rights and privileges herein conferred shall not extend to right of soil or interest in the vested funds of this Nation, unless such admitted citizen shall pay into the general funds of the national treasury a sum of money, to be ascertained and fixed by the National Council, equal to the 'pro rata' share of each native Cherokee in the lands and vested wealth of the Nation, estimated at $500, and thereafter conform to the Constitution of the Nation, and the laws made or to be made in pursuance thereof, in which case he shall be deemed a Cherokee to all intent, and be entitled to all the rights of other Cherokees." On November 28, 1877, the Council amended this proviso by striking out all after the words "this Nation" in the second line thereof, so that the proviso read: [83] would be conserved by excluding the *other., flowed from the Cherokee citizenship act, No restriction appeared to exist in the Con- which merely subjected the white man to stitution which would forbid the National the jurisdiction of the Nation, but that right Council from admitting white men to citi- resulted from express grant and the payzenship upon the condition that they should ment of a price. As to the Delawares and not acquire an estate or interest in the com- Shawnees, their participation was specificmunal or common property of the Nation." ally provided for by convention, approved Accordingly, in 1874, the Cherokee Na- by the United States, and depended upon tional Council adopted a new code contain- payments made. As to the freedmen, their ing sections relating to intermarriage, which | participation in property distribution was became effective November 1, 1875, and car- secured by the terms of the treaty of 1966 ried a provision in article XV., § 75, read- ¦ (the result of the Civil War), and of the ing as follows: constitutional amendments thereupon adopted. The court of claims referred to them thus: "These constitutional amendments were brought about by the action of the United States at the close of the Civil War in dictating that the slaves or freed persons of color in the Cherokee country should not only be admitted to the rights of citizenship, but to an equal participation in the communal or common property of the Cherokees. The Cherokees seem to have veiled their humiliation by these general declarations of the persons who should be taken and deemed to be citizens; but be that as it may, the overthrow of the Cherokee Nation and the treaty of peace, 1866, and the terms dictated by the United States, whereby their former slaves were made their political equals, and the common property of the Cherokees was to be shared in with their servants and dependents, was in effect a revolution. The constitutional amendment quoted was simply declaratory of the new order of things. It is not necessarily pro-[85] spective, and does not impose limitations upon the legislative power with regard to the naturalization or future adoption of aliens as citizens. Under the polity of the Cherokees, citizenship and communal ownership were distinct things. The citizen who annually received an annuity derived from the communal fund held by the United States, and the citizen who never received a dollar from the fund, or never so much as thought of receiving it, form a concrete object lesson in constitutional law not easily effaced from the common mind.” "Provided, also, that the rights and privileges herein conferred shall not extend to right of soil or interest in the vested funds of this Nation." Section 5 of article 3 of the Constitution of 1839 was as follows: The court of claims found that the Cherokee law remained unchanged, in this particular, from 1877 to the date of the decree. Something is said about certain compilations of the Cherokee laws of 1880 and 1892, which omitted this part of § 75, but we agree that this omission did not operate to change the existing law, as the acts providing for the compilations did not provide that they should be effective as laws of the Nation, and, where an error was committed by the compiler, the original law, as duly passed and approved, must prevail. [84] *Thus it is seen that the privilege of paying $500 into the Cherokee treasury and becoming thereby entitled to "all the rights of "Sec. 5. No person shall be eligible to a other Cherokees" existed only from Novem-seat in the National Council but a free Cherber 1, 1875, to November 28, 1877. Assum-okee male citizen, who shall have attained ing that the National Council had authority, to the age of twenty-five years. under the Cherokee Constitution of 1839 and the amendments of 1866, to confer on white intermarried citizens the privilege of purchasing a right in the soil and funds of the Nation, that privilege was withdrawn in two years, and, according to the facts found. was only availed of by two persons, neither of whom was an individual party to the suit. No right in the Nation's property | "The descendants of Cherokee men by all free women, except the African race, whose parents may have been living together as man and wife according to the customs and laws of this Nation, shall be entitled to all the rights and privileges of this Nation, well as the posterity of Cherokee women by all free men. No person who is of negro or mulatto parentage, either by the father's or as mother's side, shall be eligible to hold any office of profit, honor, or trust under this government. "Sec. 6. The electors and members of the National 'Council shall in all cases, except those of treason, felony, or breach of the peace, be privileged from arrest during their attendance at elections and at the National Council in going to and returning." ture to assume, nor desire to assume, the power to impart to the white adopted citizen other than civil and political rights. For instance, the acts of 1878, readmitting Greenway and his children and Allen and his family "to all the rights and *priv-[87] leges of citizens of the Cherokee Nation" specifically provided that no rights should be acquired except such as attach to white men, "adopted citizens of the Cherokee Nation." The amendment of § 5, in 1866, reads: "Sec. 5. No person shall be eligible to a seat in the National Council but a male cit- The acts relating to intermarriage win izen of the Cherokee Nation, who shall have whites contained many restrictions, but by attained to the age of twenty-five years and the act in respect of the intermarriage of who shall have been a bona fide resident of Cherokees with other Indians no such rethe district in which he may be elected at strictions were imposed. Cherokee act of least six months immediately preceding such Nov. 27, 1880. That act provided that the election. All native-born Cherokees, all In- marriage should be contracted according to dians and whites legally members of the Na- the law regulating marriages between "our [86]tion by adoption, and all freedmen *who have own citizens," and declared that such Inbeen liberated by voluntary act of their for- dian “shall be and is hereby deemed a Chermer owners, or by law, as well as free col-okee to all intents and purposes, and entiored persons who were in the country at the tled to the rights of other Cherokees." commencement of the Rebellion and are now There is no such language in the acts reresidents therein, or who may return with-lating to intermarried whites. in six months from the 19th day of July, 1866, and their descendants who reside within the limits of the Cherokee Nation, shall be taken and deemed to be citizens of the Cherokee Nation." We cannot accept the view that this amendment amounted to a grant of property rights, or operated to enlarge the authority of the National Council in respect of the readmission of former members of the Nation. The amendment (found in that part of the Constitution in respect to offices and elections) must be taken as a whole, and related to eligibility to a seat in the National Council, and not to property rights. The contention that the words "citizens of the Cherokee Nation" should be construed as relating to the constitutional provision of 1839, that the lands of the Nation should be common property, is without merit in view of the provisions themselves. By 2 of article 1 of the Constitution of 1839 it was provided that "whenever any citizen shall remove with his effects out of the limits of this Nation, and becomes a citizen of any other government, all his rights and privileges as a citizen of this Nation shall cease; provided, nevertheless, that the National Council shall have power to readmit, by law, to all the rights of citizenship, any such person or persons who may, at any time, desire to return to the Nation, on memorializing the National Council for such readmission." By its terms this referred to those who had been citizens, and their read mission gave no rights not originally possessed, and this was true under the amendments of 1866. Many special Cherokee laws demonstrate that the Council did not ven The treaty of 1866, between the United States and the Cherokee Nation, provided as to the former slaves, that they should be free and they "and their descendants shall have all the rights of native Cherokees." [Art. 9.] Article 15 of the same treaty, after providing for the settlement of friendly Indians amongst the Cherokees and the manner in which the latter shall be paid therefor, then stipulates that "they shall be incorporated into and ever after remain a part of the Cherokee Nation on equal terms in every respect with native citizens." When the Delawares were about to be moved into the Cherokee country as friendly Indians, it was stipulated in the agreement that "on the fulfilment by the Delawares of the foregoing stipulations, all the members of the tribe registered as above provided, shall become members of the Cherokee Nation, with the same rights and immunities and the same participation (and no other) in the national funds as native Cherokees. And the children hereafter born of such Delawares so incorporated into the Cherokee Nation shall in all respects be regarded as native Cherokees." Later, when an agreement was made with the Shawnees, were dethe amount of money to be paid was provided for, the rights of Shawnees were defined as follows: "and that *the said Shaw-[88] nees shall be incorporated into and ever after remain a part of the Cherokee Nation, on equal terms in every respect and with all the privileges and immunities of native citizens of said Cherokee Nation." These intermarried whites show no grant of equal rights as members of the Cherokee Nation by treaty or otherwise, nor have they | essarily follow from the concession of the (excepting the two individuals heretofore former." referred to) paid any sum into the Nation's treasury for a pro rata share of its monev and lands. The Delawares, the Shawnees, and the freedmen acquired their property rights by the express words of treaties, but the intermarried whites cannot point out any such in their favor. Doubtless because of this they have heretofore asserted no claim, although the Cherokee courts were open to them to do so, and have allowed repeated payments of money to be made to every other citizen without question. Referring to this, the court of claims said in its opinion in the present case, 40 Ct. Cl. 411, 442: "It cannot be supposed for a moment that Congress intended by this legislation to take away from some of the Cherokee people propcrty which was constitutionally theirs, or to confer upon white citizens property which they were not legally entitled to have. The term 'citizens' in these statutes of the United States must be construed to mean those citizens who were constitutionally or legally entitled to share in the allotment of the lands." The doctrine is familiar that the language of a statute is to be interpreted in the light of the particular matter in hand and the object sought to be accomplished, as mani The distinction between different classes of citizens was recognized by the Cherokees in the differences in their intermarriage law, as applicable to the whites and to the Indians of other tribes: by the provision in the intermarriage law that a white man in-fested by other parts of the act, and the termarried with an Indian by blood acquires words used may be qualified by their sur certain rights as a citizen, but no provision roundings and connections. that if he marries a Cherokee citizen not of In accepting the conclusion of the court of Indian blood he shall be regarded as a citi- claims in this regard we, nevertheless, deem zen at all; and by the provision that if, once it proper to somewhat consider the conhaving married an Indian by blood, he mar-gressional legislation relied on by the claimries the second time a citizen not by blood, he loses all of his rights as a citizen. And the same distinction between citizens as such and citizens with property rights has also been recognized by Congress in enactments relating to other Indians than the Five Civilized Tribes. Act August 9, 1888, 25 Stat. at L. 392, chap. 818; act May 2, 1890, 26 Stat. at L. 96, chap. 182; act June 7, 1897, 30 Stat. at L. 90, chap. 3. In Whitmire v. Cherokee Nation, 30 Ct. Cl. 138, 152, the court of claims said: "Here it should be noted that when the treaty was made there had long been a peculiar class of citizens in the Cherokee country,[89] white men who became *citizens by intermarriage." And, after quoting the proviso to § 75, art. 15, of the Cherokee Code of 1874, the court added: "The idea, therefore, existed both in the mind and in the laws of the Cherokee people, that citizenship did not necessarily extend to or invest in the citizen a personal or individual interest in what the Constitution termed the 'common prop: erty,' 'the lands of the Cherokee Nation.' In Stephens v. Cherokee Nation, 174 U. S. 445, 488, 43 L. ed. 1041, 1056, 19 Sup. Ct. Rep. 722, 738, this court, in respect of certain acts of Congress, observed: "It may be remarked that the legislation seems to recognize, especially the act of June 28, 1898 [30 Stat. at L. 495, chap. 517], a distinction between admission to citizenship merely and the distribution of property to be subsequently made, as if there might be circumstances under which the right to a share in the latter would not nec ants. The act of Congress of July 1, 1902 (32 Stat. at L. 716, chap. 1375), ratified by the Cherokee Nation, August 7, 1902, and often called the Cherokee agreement, contained these sections: *"Sec. 25. The roll of citizens of the Cher-[90] okee Nation shall be made as of September first, nineteen hundred and two, and the names of all persons then living and entitled to enrolment on that date shall be placed on said roll by the Commission to the Five Civilized Tribes. "Sec. 26. The names of all persons living on the first day of September, nineteen hundred and two, entitled to be enrolled as provided in section twenty-five hereof, shall be placed upon the roll made by said Commission, and no child born there after to a citizen, and no white person who has intermarried with a Cherokee citizen since the sixteenth day of December, eighteen hundred and ninety-five, shall be entitled to enrolment or to participate in the distribution of the tribal property of the Cherokee Nation. "Sec. 27. Such rolls shall, in all other re spects, be made in strict compliance with the provisions of section twenty-one of the act of Congress approved June twenty-eighth, eighteen hundred and ninety-eight (30 Stat. at L. 495, chap. 517), and the act of Congress approved May thirty-first, nineteen hundred (31 Stat. at L. 221, chap. 598). "Sec. 28. No person whose name appears upon the roll made by the Dawes Commission as a citizen or freedman of any other tribe shall be enrolled as a citizen of the against as may be provided in other cases Cherokee Nation. "Sec. 29. For the purpose of expediting the enrolment of the Cherokee citizens and the allotment of lands as herein provided, the said Commission shall, from time to time, and as soon as practicable, forward to the Secretary of the Interior lists upon which shall be placed the names of those persons found by the Commission to be entitled to enrolment. The lists thus prepared, when approved by the Secretary of the Interior, shall constitute a part and parcel of the final roll of citizens of the Cherokee tribe, upon which allotment of land and distribution of other tribal property shall be made. When there shall have been submitted to and ap[91]proved by the *Secretary of the Interior lists embracing the names of all those lawfully entitled to enrolment, the roll shall be deemed complete. The roll so prepared shall be made in quadruplicate, one to be deposited with the Secretary of the Interior, one with the Commissioner of Indian Affairs, one with the principal chief of the Cherokee Nation, and one to remain with the Commission to the Five Civilized Tribes. "Sec. 30. During the months of September and October, in the year nineteen hundred and two, the Commission to the Five Civilized Tribes may receive applications for enrolment of such infant children as may have been born to recognized and enrolled citizens of the Cherokee Nation on or before the first day of September, nineteen hundred and two, but the application of no person whomsoever for enrolment shall be received after the thirty-first day of October, nineteen hun. dred and two. "Sec. 31. No person whose name does not appear upon the roll prepared as herein provided shall be entitled to in any manner participate in the distribution of the common property of the Cherokee tribe, and those whose names appear thereon shall participate in the manner set forth in this act: Provided, That no allotment of land or other tribal property shall be made to any person, or to the heirs of any person, whose name is on said roll and who died prior to the first day of September, nineteen hundred and two. The right of such person to any interest in the lands or other tribal property shall be deemed to have become extinguished and to have passed to the tribe in general upon his death before said date, and any person or persons who may conceal the death of any one on said roll as aforesaid for the purpose of profiting by said concealment, and who shall knowingly receive any portion of any land or other tribal property or of the proceeds so arising from any allotment prohibited by this section, shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and shall be proceeded of felony, and the penalty for this offense It thus appears that the roll of citizens' of the Cherokee Nation was to be made up as of September 1, 1902, of the persons then living and entitled to enrolment on that date; that all such persons should be placed upon the roll, and that (§ 29) on the lists to be finally approved by the Secretary of the Interior there should be placed only the names of those persons found to be entitled to enrolment. In all other respects the roll was to be made in compliance with § 21 of the Act of Congress of June 28, 1898, and of the Act of Congress of May 31, 1900. . Section 21 provided: "That in making rolls of citizenship of the several tribes, as required by law, the Commission to the Five Civilized Tribes is authorized and directed to take the roll of Cherokee citizens of eighteen hundred and eighty (not including freedmen) as the only roll intended to be confirmed by this and preceding acts of Congress, and to enroll all persons now living whose names are found on said roll, with such intermarried white persons as may be entitled to citizenship under Cherokee laws." The roll of 1880, made by the Cherokees, was a census roll, and its confirmation was not intended to create any rights which citizens of the Cherokee Nation had not before enjoyed, but merely to furnish the basis for making up the roll of citizens. Section 21 was in reality a statement that no previous act of Congress was intended to confirm any other roll of the Cherokee Nation. The act of May 31, 1900 (31 Stat. at L. 221, 236, chap. 598), provided: "That said Commission shall continue to exercise all authority heretofore conferred on it by law. But it shall not receive, consider, or make any record of any application of any person for enrolment as a member of any tribe in Indian territory who has not been a recog nized citizen thereof, and duly and lawfully enrolled or admitted as such, and its refusal *of such application shall be final when ap-[93] proved by the Secretary of the Interior." Section 31 of the act of July 1, 1902, says that no person whose name does not appear on the roll made by the Commission to the Five Civilized Tribes "shall be entitled to in any manner participate in the distribution of the common property of the Cherokee tribe, and those whose names appear thereon shall participate in the manner set forth in this act." In other words, the roll |