 | United States. Congress. Senate - 1861 - 580 psl.
...of necessity, fly to anarchy or to despotism. Unanimity is impossible ; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible; so...that such decisions must be binding, in any case, upon the parties to a suit, as to the object of that suit, while they are also entitled to very high... | |
 | Charles Lempriere - 1861 - 336 psl.
...of necessity, fly to anarchy or to despotism. Unanimity is impossible. The rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible. So...that such decisions must be binding, in any case, upon the parties to a suit, as to the object of that suit, while they are also entitled to very high... | |
 | Orville James Victor - 1861 - 586 psl.
...a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible ; so that rejecting the majority principle, anarcby or despotism in some form is all that is left. " I...forget the position assumed by some that Constitutional qnestions are to be decided by the Supreme Court ; nor do I deny that such decision must be binding,... | |
 | Ludwig Karl Aegidi - 1861 - 462 psl.
...despotism. Unanimity is impossible; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholl)' inadmissible ; so that, rejecting the majority principle,...anarchy Or despotism in some form is all that is left, ^f I do not forget the position assumed by some, that constitutional questions are to be decided by... | |
 | Robert Tomes, Benjamin G. Smith - 1862 - 764 psl.
...of necessity, fly to anarchy or to despotism. Unanimity is impossible ; the rule of a majority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible. So...deny that such decisions must be binding in any case upon the parties to a suit as to the object of that suit, while they are also entitled to very high... | |
 | John Codman Hurd - 1862 - 854 psl.
...decisions (ante, p. 245, n.). President Lincoln, in his Inaugural, March 4, 1861, has said : — " 1 do not forget the position assumed by some, that constitutional...deny that such decisions must be binding in any case upon the parties to a suit, as to the object of that suit, while they are also entitled to very high... | |
 | David Brainerd Williamson - 1864 - 210 psl.
...of necessity, fly to nnarcby or to despotism. Unanimity is impossible ; the rule of a majority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible. So...deny that such decisions must be binding in any case upon the parties to a suit, as to the object of that suit, while they are also entitled to very high... | |
 | Joseph Hartwell Barrett - 1864 - 544 psl.
...of necessity, fly to anarchy or to despotism. Unanimity is impossible ; the rule of a majority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible. So...deny that such decisions must be binding in any case upon the parties to a suit, as to the object of that suit, while they are also entitled to a very high... | |
 | Horace Greeley - 1864 - 694 psl.
...of necessity, fly to anarchy or to despotism. Unanimity is impossible; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible. So...Supreme Court, nor do I deny that such decisions must bo binding in any case upon the parties to a suit, as to the object of that suit, while they are also... | |
 | Edward McPherson - 1864 - 462 psl.
...necessity, fly to anarchy or to despotism. Unanimity is impossible ; the rule of a> minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible ; so...decided by the Supreme Court ; nor do I deny that sach .decision must be binding, in any case, upon the parties to a suit, as to the object of that suit,... | |
| |
Unanimity is impossible. The rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or despotism in some form is all that is left. 
