Puslapio vaizdai
PDF
„ePub“
[graphic]
[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

This Edition was First Published in 1905

THE ABERDEEN UNIVERSITY PRESS LIMITED

I

PREFACE

N this edition of the correspondence of Charles Lamb, that of his sister, Mary Lamb, is for the first time included. In it

also appear for the first time between seventy and eighty letters, many of them of the highest importance; and it is the first edition to take note in chronological order of those letters printed by other editors that are not available for the present volumes: a step which should, I think, add to the biographical value of the work.

In these two volumes I have, after much consideration, placed my notes at the end of each letter, rather than, as in the five preceding volumes, at the end of the book. My reason for doing so was twofold: in the first place, to serve the convenience of the reader, to whom annotation of the correspondence is often a necessity, and not, as in the case of the other writings, a luxury; and in the second place, because by joining the letters with a few words of commentary they can be made practically into a consecutive Life. The self-conscious deliberate construction of Lamb's essays and poems, each a work of art, forbade the introduction of footnotes that might distract the attention from the true matter of the text: hence, in the preceding five volumes, such remarks as the editor had to make will be found sharply separated from the author's part of the book. But here, where Lamb is often writing without premeditation, with a running pen, and writing moreover for a single reader, it seemed to me that the impropriety of interrupting the correspondence by elucidatory comments was SO slight as to be almost non-existent. (I say "running pen," but there is, however, I think very little doubt that Lamb also now

79647

and then made a rough draft of a letter first, afterwards polishing it and adding to it from time to time before he made a fair copy for his correspondent. It is unlikely, as the late Mr. Dykes Campbell has pointed out, that he could have written some of these letters off-hand as neatly and cleanly as in their existing state.) Many of my notes, I am greatly afraid, will be thought a superfluity. But having begun this edition with the determination to make it as complete and illustrative as I could, I have continued, in the Letters, to trace the sources of quotations, and to attend to other minutiæ.

Owing to the curious operations of the law of copyright, it will not for at least forty-two years be possible for any one edition of Lamb's correspondence to contain all the letters. To-day, in order to possess a set complete down to the present time, one must purchase at least nine, and possibly more, works, amounting to many volumes—among them Charles Lamb and the Lloyds, of which I was the editor, but which I am debarred from using. It is in order, to some extent, to meet the difficulty thus set up, and to cover the whole ground of the correspondence, that I have in the notes drawn attention to every important letter distributed over these many other volumes. I am, however, perfectly aware that only for a brief period will this list be exhaustive, since new letters continually come to light, while there are, I understand, at this moment in private collections in America many letters that have not yet been printed, forty-two years' copyright in which may date from the day they are published—for the benefit not of any descendants of the Lambs (for they left none) but of those who happen to possess them.

That we have the Lamb correspondence in a very imperfect state will be patent to any one who looks at the dates in the Table of Contents to this book. It is incredible that Lamb wrote only seventy letters between the years 1807 and 1820, and only four in 1811-13. It is incredible also that he wrote altogether only three letters to Leigh Hunt, and only four to Hood. The many letters that he must have written to other friends-Martin Burney, for example-have entirely vanished. At any minute, however, others may be discovered ; and there is no call for despair, especially when we recollect that the two letters of July 20, 1819, to Miss Kelly,

« AnkstesnisTęsti »