Puslapio vaizdai
PDF
„ePub“

eless bird. The snipe, perhaps.
ice is said to have had a profound
on English officials. Of that, one is glad;
e's quarrel with Mr. Galsworthy is that
I never think anything out. He inveighs
t solitary confinement, which is a good
to do; but he does not offer any sub-
solution, which would be an even better
to do. He sentimentalizes over dead
nts and dead everything; but he gives
O suggestions as to what kind of laws
s. He objects to existing divorce laws,
does not come out into the open and
st what divorce laws, if any, he would
se to enact. It is not, apparently, either
dice or expediency on his part; it is
inability to think constructively in any
That is characteristic of many modern
ners: they want the bars let down here
re, but they never tell you in what spot
rs ought to be set up again. Beyond
entle impulses, they are perfectly vague.
nes, I suppose, of trying to do your
g with your heart instead of with your

will incre fact,

I

I fe

Μα

Mr.

of 1 back

fro

him

it v

him

it w

Co

sha

can

out

tha ba tha

ar

ist

perhaps. had a profon that, one is gla Galsworthy is the out. He inveigts which is a go not offer any sub be an even bette calizes over deal ing; but he gives hat kind of la ting divorce laws

and

nto the open
if any, he would

apparently, either

it is

n his part; structively in an of many modem rs let down here you in what spot p again. Beyond perfectly vagu ying to do your ead of with your

will not rid himself of that fault increasingly explicit about sexual em fact, that never was his game.

I

may seem to speak bitterly. I co I feel some bitterness. For I adm Man of Property exceedingly, and Mr. Galsworthy to carry on a great of fiction. Instead of which, he has backing, backing-farther and fart from the Presence. Some people, I k him up with The Patrician because, it was straight Mrs. Humphry Wa him up forever with The Freeland it was bad Mrs. Humphrey Ward; in Coryston Family was much better.

Now we come to our syndicate. W shall we begin? It is hard to choos can you deal with them separately outstanding fact is that they all w that they deal in the same characters backgrounds, and the same situat that they have the same point of v are like the Pléïade or the seven N ists. Only they do not know it. At

write of Jacob Stahl, and that Mr. Mace, not Mr. W. L. George, shall deal Michael Fane? And does Mr. Walpole off o' nights to Mr. Beresford and offer some Jacob Stahl if Mr. Beresford take a few chapters of Fortitude off _nds? Does Mr. Mackenzie write a page Prelude to Adventure while Mr. Waltakes a turn at Sinister Street? Who the murders? Is it Mr. Walpole or Mr. s? Which one of them has been aped to frequent the Empire? Does Mr. e investigate female psychology for the ? And what (but this I cannot even O does Mr. D. H. Lawrence "cover"? is may seem to be mere petulance, but ot. The chief value of fiction is, I take provide us with vicarious experience. A novelist who sticks to the truth is, above forming. We enlarge our own world by g him. No one, in his own person, can gate all social milieux in all civilized and the big novels and the big plays ext-books to the humanist. How much

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]
[ocr errors]

Mr. Berin
of Fortale t
anzie wate
wille Me Fe
ter Street Wr
· Walpole or V
em has been p
mpire? Does M
sychology for th
is I cannot eve
awrence "cover"
ere petulance, be
E fiction is, I tak

ous experience!
The truth is, abor
our own worldb

own person,
in all civilize
nd the big pla
nist. How m

novelists! Most of us get our Kipling. There are not wanting quarrel with Kipling's interpret with his description; but the fact r a vast number of people know a facts about Indian and Anglo-Indi they would never have known with

So that it is really not only the but the wilful extravagance, of syndicate that we complain of. half a dozen authors and a rour novels to tell us the same thing i way? They do not even react di the same facts: they react precisely haps that is valuable as reinforci phasizing the stated or implied o one has the sense that one is nev learn anything more from any of that is discouraging to the humanis ious experience bent. Perhaps one cept Mr. Walpole from that cha extent: he gave us something n Dark Forest. In that book, at leas the Russians pleasanter than any o novelists (except possibly Turge

bethans, the scholars would still be gling over problems of their collaboraTheir novels would be like the Beaumonther-Middleton-Rowley plays.

o begin with, there is always the same g man. Sometimes he has a university ation, and then he is the hero of SinisStreet or The Stranger's Wedding; some= he has omitted the university, and then s the hero of Jacob Stahl or Fortitude. has usually decided, when we meet him, there is nothing in religion; he is usually us to do something noble and unconven1; and sooner or later he nearly always inters very seriously a young woman actually or potentially, light morals. etimes he is rich and meets her at the ire; sometimes he is poor and meets her e slums. Sometimes it is an accident, but ly he might fairly be said to be looking er. For he is humanitarian, always; either is gentle nature, or because socialistic nents have got hold of him; and a good of space is always given up to sheer in

poss some men.

hum

of t nigh

at a

in th sync

beca

[ocr errors][merged small]

to

affe

feel

per exc Per ber

abo

und

it 1

pat

« AnkstesnisTęsti »