TABLE OF CASES (It will be noted that some of the cases in the following Table have no page references. These cases are not referred to in the text, but are included here as they bear on the subject). Albridge vs. Williams, 3 How. 1. PAGE 184 Alexander vs. State, 56 Ga. 478. Arnett vs. State, 80 N. E. 153. Arver vs. United States, and other cases, The Selective Draft 144 Brushaber vs. Union Pacific R. R. Co., 240 U. S. 1. 35, 58, 68, 130, 143, 144, 150, 152, 155, 162 Chester vs. Bateson, [1920] 1 K. B. 829. Cincinnati, Wilmington, &c. Railroad vs. Commissioners, 1 Ohio St. 88... City of Clinton vs. Philipps, 58 Ill. 102. City of Evansville vs. Miller, 146 Ind. 613.. 121 165 154 Commonwealth vs. County of Hampden, 2 Pick. 414. 304 Commonwealth vs. Sisson, 189 Mass. 247.. 174 Cross vs. Harrison, 16 How. 164... 245 Dakota Central Telephone vs. South Dakota, 250 U. S. 163..147, 162 155 163 Deslions vs. La Compagnie Générale Transatlantique, 210 U. S. 95, 184 Dooley vs. United States, 182 U. S. 222. .38, 56, 57, 247 Dowling and another vs. Lancashire Ins. Co., 92 Wis. 63.... 35, 39, 45, 49, 58, 121, 129, 130, 131, 144, 147, 150, 152, 216 Field vs. People 3 Ill. 79.. First National Bank vs. Fellows ex rel. Union Trust Co., 244 Gelston vs. Hoyt, 3 Wheat. 248. PAGE 221 144, 153, 157 .116, 249 Geofroy vs. Riggs, 133 U. S. 258. Gilhooley vs. City of Elizabeth, 66 N. J. Law 484. Grapeshot, The, 9 Wall. 129.. Gratiot vs. United States, 4 How. 118. Grisar vs. United States, 6 Wall. 363. Harmon vs. Ohio, 66 Ohio St. 249. Houghton vs. Payne, 194 U. S. 88. Hurtado vs. California, 110 U. S. 516.. 42, 51 .215, 219 311 220 124, 125 245 243 184 .149, 150 49 122, 207, 225 184 304 133, 160, 170 .210, 227, 229-235 Illinois Central R. R. Co. vs. McKendree, 203 U. S. 514. Illinois State Board vs. People, 123 Ill. 227. In re Kollock, 165 U. S. 526.. In re Neagle, 135 U. S. 1. Intermountain Rate Cases, 234 U. S. 476. .144, 153, 156 Interstate Commerce Commission vs. Brimson, 154 U. S. 447... U. S. 194.. Jecker vs. Montgomery, 13 Wall. 498. Lapeyre vs. United States, 17 Wall. 191. Lochner vs. New York, 198 U. S. 45. .144, 153 .249 222 190, 191, 304 216 117, 130 243 322 176 309 123, 165 143 162, 309 .31, 32, 191, 304 .60, 162, 174, 289, 291 .120, 124, 153 169 184 .41, 149, 181 Monongahela Bridge Co. vs. United States, 216 U. S. 177....58, 156 Morrill vs. Jones, 106 U. S. 466. .41, 181 Mutual Film Co. vs. Industrial Commission, 236 U. S. 230..143, 150 .56, 245 PAGE Noble State Bank vs. Haskell, 219 U. S. 104.. 123, 147 Oceanic Steam Nav. Co. vs. Stranahan, 214 U. S. 320.. Ohio Valley Water Co. vs. Ben Avon Borough et al., 253 U. S. 473 163 O'Neil et al. vs. Insurance Co., 166 Pa. 72. Pacific States Tel. and Tel. Co. vs. Oregon, 223 U. S. 113. 123 Parsons vs. United States, 167 U. S. 324. 197 Pensacola Tel. Co. vs. Western Union Tel. Co., 196 U. S. 1. 124 220 People vs. Klinck Packing Co., 214 N. Y. 121. People ex rel. Sheppard vs. State Board of Dental Examiners, 110 Ill. 180.. Plymouth Coal Co. vs. Pennsylvania, 232 U. S. 531 Prentis vs. Atlantic Coast Line, 211 U. S. 210. Prize Cases, 2 Black 635.. .62, 95, 141 Public Service Gas Co. vs. State Board of Public Utility Com missioners, 84 N. J. L. 463.. Raymond vs. Thomas, 91 U. S. 712. 249 Red "C" Oil Co. vs. North Carolina, 222 U. S. 380.. South Carolina vs. United States, 199 U. S. 437. St. Louis I. M. & S. R. Co. vs. Taylor, 210 U. S. 281..144, 150, 152, 157 310 Twining vs. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 78.. Trial of Aaron Burr. See Appeal of Hartranft et al. (85 Union Bridge Co. vs. United States, 204 U. S. 364. United States vs. Antikamnia Chemical Co., 231 U. S. 654.. Pa. 304 122 .58, 156 184 United States vs. Gettysburg Electric Railway Co., 160 U. S. 668, 141 United States vs. Midwest Oil Co., 236 U. S. 459. 184 245 182 United States vs. Two Hundred Barrels, 95 U. S. 571. 181 |