intrigue and exile of Rama (2) another account but with variations. Rama is represented as a vegetarian, the incident of Maricha is omitted. Rama kills Vali a fair fight and in the end turns mendicant. That Valmiki the undoubted author of the Ramayana was an ancient Rishi is abundantly clear from mention being made of him in the Taittareya Pratesakhya and the Vajasenyi Samhita. The state of society as described by him also shows that it must have been prior to the Sutra period and when, as observed by Mr. Vaidya "sacrifice was a most distinguishing feature of Aryan worship, when Buddhism was unknown, when idol worship did not exist, when Brahmins and Kshatriyas freely ate animal food, when women learnt the Vedas and performed Vedic rites, when Kshatriyas competed with Brahmans in learning and Brahmins with Ksatriyas in archery." Referring to Kalidasa Mr. Smith thinks he flourished in the reigns of Chandragupta II and Kumaragupta and would place him between A. D. 413 or 455 or slightly later. As regards the age on of Kalidasa a great deal depends on who the Vikramaditya was in whose reign tradition asserts be flourished and this again depends on when the Saka Era commenced or by whom it was established. I think Sir William Jones was probably right when he placed Kalidasa in the first century before the Christian Era. There is no very strong reason to discredit the Hindu tradition that the Samvat Era commencing from 57 57 B. C. was founded by Vikramaditya at whose court Kalidasa (one of the nine gems) is said to have flourished. The theory advanced by Fergusson is that the Vikrama Era 56 B. C. was a date arrived at by the taking the date of great battle of Karur in which Vikramaditya of Ujjain finally defeated the Sakas in 544 A. D. and by before throwing back in new era 600 years that date ie. 56 B. C. It is difficult to see why Vikramaditya or anybody else intent on glorifying the battle of Karur and founding an Era on that date should fix upon a date The theory of Fergusson 600 years prior. inclined which Professor Max Muller to accept is rudely inscription in the reign Pulikesin II who shaken by the Aihole of the Chalukyan King according to Mr. Smith reigned from 608 to 642 A. D. The inscrip tion gives the dates of two Eras, namely 3735 years from the Bharata war and 556 of the Saka Kings. Kings. (Sakanam Bhubhujam). There to must have therefore been a Saka Era dating delayed for some centuries after the Christian Era. WOMEN POETS OF THE RIG VEDA BY MR. KRISHNA KANTA HANDIQUI, M.A. N the far off age of the Rigveda, shrouded in "undefined antiquity," in the words of the German scholar Winternitz, the intellect of Indian women did not remain inactive while "the seven singers (sages) were voicing forth, in concert, the (Vedic) speech", to borrow a line from the Rig Veda (10713). Several hymns of the Rig Veda composed by women have come down to us representing the earliest intellectual activities of women in the Aryan world. The first note worthy poetess whom we meet with is Viswavara Atreyee (R. V. 5.28) who has composed a hymn to Agni in five verses, couched in four different metres. Viswavara's hymn is one of the easiest and simplest that we find in the Rig Veda. Here is a translation of the fourth verse: "Thy splendour, O Agni! Kindled and brilliant, I do adore. Showerer (of gifts) and possessed of wealth, thou art kindled in sacrifices." From the first verse of the hymn we gather that there were women "worshipping the gods with oblations" as there were men. Then comes Apala Atreyee (R. V. 8.91) The hymn is based on a story in which Apala herself is the chief figure. She seems to have been abandoned by her husband owing to her disease, but subsequently heiled by the grace of Indra, for whom the forlorn lady could not afford to press out the soma juice with the Gravans or stones of the regular soma ritual, but only pressed it with her teeth. She prays to Indra: "Thou who goest shining, a hero, to every house, drink this (soma) pressed with my (teeth), mixed with grains and curds, with cakes and songs" (8'913) In the fourth verse she speaks of "women wronged by (their) husbands" as she herself was. Let us now turn to Ghosa Kaksheevatee (R. V. 10 39, 40), who has two hymns containing fourteen verses each. Ghosa belongs to a family that has produced a generation of Vedic poets: Both Ghosa and her son Sanhastya offer their prayers to the Aswins-the Vedic Dioskouroi. Her verses are not as simple and direct as those of Vi wavara or Apala; and in fact Prof. Grassmann styles as obscure the last five verses of one of the hymns of Ghosa (10.40.10-14) She has drawn almost all her allusions from the hymns of her father Kaksheevan in the First Mandala (1116, 117 particularly) and has in some cases reproduced the language of her father. Ghosa's originality however, apart from her independent verses, is manifest in her condensing of the selected allusions and giving them a new back ground to a considerable extent. Here is one of her verses: "Where among what people are the Aswins, destroyers (of foes), lords of beauty, delighted to-day? Who has detained (them)? To what sage's or what sacrificer's abode are they gone ?" (10:40 14). We find in Kaksheevan's hymn, 1117 7,— also indicated in verses of Ghosa herself-that she remained unmarried to an advanced age in her father's home till she was favoured with a husband by the Aswins and from 1122.5 we gather that he was Arjuna. We need not take Arjuna as a common noun, after Sayana, for the word Arjuneya in 1 112 23 and 4 26 1 is used as a proper noun to mean "a descendant of Arjuna." In one of her hymns Ghosa calls herself a princess, so that Kaksheevan may have been a royal sage. Then there are ten sweet and well-balanced verses composed jointly by two other female poets, Sikata and Nivavaree (9 86·11-20). The verses form part of a hymn, addressed to Soma, by various authors. Here is a verse by Sikata and Nivavaree: "Clad in an armour (of lustre) that touches the heaven, worthy of sacred rites and filling up the sky fixed in the worlds; and knowing the heaven, he (Soma) comes on with rains and worships heaven's ancient lord" (9'86·14). There is then a verse by a lady named Godha in a hymn to Indra (10 134) and another by the sister of the sage Agastya in the first half of a heterogeneous hymn in the Tenth Mandala. We should also take note of two verses on love by Lopamudra (1·179 1-2) her object being to turn her ascetic lord Agastya into a loving husband. Agastya replies to her in the same spirit in the next two verses. There is a similar but indelicate conversation between King Bhavayavya and his wife Romasa, being two verses, added without any apparent connection to Hymn 1.126. The verses are in a metre different from that of the preceding ones and might very well be a frag ment of a popular song, as suggested by Griffith. So much for hymns by women. In the Tenth Mandala there are two incantations in simple language (10-145, 159) supposed to be by Indrani and Sachi respectively, the subject being the overpowering of rival co-wives. Both Indrani and Sachi are mythical names, but "Sachi" means "action" according to Nirukta and it had probably a historical back ground. Rivalry of cowives is a matter of everyday experience and it is not surprising to have a poem on the subject by the victorious party like that of Sachi. Sachi's tone is exultant indeed-" There rises the sun, then my Fortune is up" (10 1591). These, then, are our earliest women poets. There are some other names, but it is doubtful whether they refer to real personages. The verse ascribed by the Anukramani to the lady Saswatee (8-1-34) and the hymn ascribed to Juhu (10-109) seem to be rather composed by others about them, by the sage Urdhanabha in the case of Juhu. But even leaving aside the legendary and doubtful names we have, as shown above, not less than eight historical figures as the first cultured women of India, whose hymns were admitted freely into the holy sacrificial system of the Veda. 1 The following is a symposium of views on the existing system of University education, culled from the answers given by a number of distinguished educationists before the Calcutta University Commission, for the question :-"Do you consider that the Existing System of University Education affords to Young Indians of ability 'full opportunities of obtaining the highest training? If not, in what main respects do you consider the Existing System deficient from this point of view?" Ed.. I.R. SIR GOOROO DASS BANERJEE, Kt., M.A., D.L., PH.D. I do not consider that the existing system of University education affords to young Indians of ability full opportunity of obtaining the highest training,' and the defect, I think, lies partly in the system, and partly in the working of it, which may, at any time be good or bad according to the personnel employed. To make my answer clear I should state that by the system' I mean the body of rules and regulations of the University, and by the 'working' of the system I mean the body of persons engaged for the time being in working out those rules and regulations and the 'manner' in which they work. (i) The main defects in the system, that is, in the rules and regulation's are: (a) The imparting of knowledge to Bengali students through the medium of English, a difficult foreign language, difficult by reason of its stock of words, as well as by its structure of sentences, being so very different from those of the Bengali language. The learner has not only to learn the subjects of study, but has also to learn the language in which those subjects are taught, that is, he requires the explanation of the subject matter explained to him. This not only overtaxes his time and energies, but also cramps his thoughts which cannot expand beyond his foreign language range, which is very limited. (b) The encouraging of a wrong method of teaching English up to the matriculation stage, that is, the method which seeks to make boys learn English by copious, and, therefore necessarily superficial, reading of a large number of books, in preference to the method of thorough and careful reading of a few selected text-books in literature, with a text-book in grammar. Copious rapid reading may help to make one a ready writer and speaker in his vernacular, but not in a difficult foreign language, which can be learnt correctly only by close and thorough reading of a few well-chosen books and a text-book on grammar at the early stages of the student's progress. (c) The allowing of bifurcation, specialisation, and a multiplicity of options at an early stage, which may, and does, lead to the neglect of important subjects like history, geography, logic, and physics, the elements of which ought to be known by every student. Under existing conditions, one may become a B.A. without having even turned a page of history, geogra phy, logic, or physics. (d) The preferring of quantity to quality of knowledge in the higher courses of study, and making those courses so long as to render thoroughness practically unattainable by the majority of students, and attainable, if at all, with great difficulty, only by the most intelligent and diligent. (ii) The main defects in the working of the system are: (a) That we do not always get first rate men in prescribing the courses of study. (b) That we do not always get first rate men in teaching our students. (c) That we do not always get first rate men in conducting our examinations. HON. JUSTICE SIR P. C. BANERJI, M.A. Vice-Chancellor, University of Allahabad. The present system of University education, which is based on the system which obtained in the University of London at the time when the Indian Universities were founded, has afforded to young Indians ample opportunity of obtaining high educational training. Many of those who obtained University degrees have proved to be men of the highest culture and great efficiency in various walks of life. It should be the aim of every University so to train up its alumni as to make them not only men of learning, but useful citizens, and this object has, in a great measure, been attained. In view, however, of modern ideals the Indian Universities cannot be regarded as fulfilling all the requirements of a modern University, and cannot be deemed to afford the best facilities for mental training. The same defects which have been found to exist in the University of London equally, or to a greater extent, exist in the universities in this country. It must be admitted that the system by which degrees are conferred on the result of examinations only encourages cram, and is not always a test of mental ability. The defects of this system are mostly of the same nature as those mentioned in paragraph 83 of the report of Lord Haldane's Commission. These defects may, to a great extent, be remedied by introducing teaching Universities. But the difficulty of having teaching Universities in this country is very great unless the number of such universities be liberally increased. Having regard to the size of the country, and the vast distances between large and important towns, it is practically impossible to have a few centres only where large Universities like that of Calcutta may be established-with a number of colleges at each of these centres all the students of which may be taught by University professors. In order that the Universities in this country may be teaching Universities it is, in my opinion, absolutely essential that small Universities should be established at different centres, and the system of having large and unwieldy Universities should be done away with. For example, in the United Provinces, instead of having one large University for the whole province at Allahabad it would be desirable to have small Universities at places like Agra, Lucknow, and Allahabad, and all of these should be teaching Universities. Benares has already a University of its own and Aligarh may have one in the near future. It would, it seems, be beneficial to the educational interests of this country if the system which has, in recent times, been adopted in England of having smaller Universities than the older Universities of Oxford and Cambridge be extended to this country. This, of course, will require a large outlay of money, both at the initial stage and subsequently, for the maintenance of each University, and I need hardly say that it must always be borne in mind that. in every scheme for the promotion and expansion of efficient education, as in everything else, financial considerations should be at the forefront. PROF, PATRICK GEDDES. No; the existing system is not merely deficient; it is a wrong system. However, this may be mitigated by the individual teachers at their best. For the old and false psychology and pedagogy, now and increa- . singly discredited in all living schools, is still, and peculiarly, conserved in the universities. Witness, e.g.: (a) The essential insistence on passive memorising of lecture notes and text-books, in short on cram for the examinations. (b) Mass instruction, without sufficient individual contact with teachers, and free questioning of them accordingly. (c) Insistence on details, and examination too much on these, with insufficient general comprehension and appreciation of the subject. (d) Deficiency of practical and original work. (e) Individualistic distinctions, by examination results too much apart from the above considerations. (f) Attainment of mere bread-winning employment, too much apart from true professional ambitions. (g) Starvation of aesthetic, practical, social, and moral interests generally, inevitable on any diet of mere knowledge. (h) Resultant college atmosphere too much exhaled from solitary drudgeries, and these in prevalent anxiety and fear-fear alike of approaching examinations and of future uselessness. (i) Consequent scarcity of true academic life, that of vivid adolescence, inspired and guided by vital senescenis, all feeling at leisure and liberty, yet concentrating these towards active study and discussion, and through (thus clarified) social purpose towards more and more effective attainment and service. HON. JUSTICE SIR ASUTOSH CHAUDHURI, M.A. The existing system is without an ideal or a definite ultimate aim. The country wants education to enable the people to stand on their own legs in every respect, "to prepare them for complete living" to develop their work power and character power; to give them all-round strength. A system originally meant for obtaining efficient clerks and now, to a limited extent, for vocational work, is failing to meet the progressive needs of our people. Our University has failed to appreciate that it ought to help the process of nation-building. “It is not inspired by motives which things in human nature and the higher things in answer to deeper human aspiration." It is not based upon things which lie close to the hearts of our people. It has little regard for our permanent environment. It is a makeshift, and without a corporate life. It has not been allowed sufficient freedom of growth. Its utility is doubted, and it is viewed with suspision, as tending to disloyalty. Educational institutions are now subjected to undue political surveillance. There is a lack of proper teachers. In Government colleges the foreign element is placed on an undeserved and undesirable basis of superiority. The Indian teacher occupies an inferior position. HON. MR. J. G. COVERNTON, M.A., C.I.E. At present the existing system of University education does not afford full opportunity of obtaining the highest training. In the first place, the lower portion of the Univer sity course is little better than a school course. The students entering the university are too young and without a sufficiently high secondary education to enable them to enter on a real university course as soon as they go to college. Hence, the first two years of their University studies would be much better devoted to more thorough work on secondary school lines. If the secondary education were improved and lengthened, students of ability entering the University, would be able to get a better grip on university subjects and thus would be better equipped for the higher work when they came to it in due course. Secondly, the methods of the present system are not such as to afford the best training. Students look too much to examinations and much of the work done is merely of a mechanical kind for particular examina tions. This applies not only to a large majority of students, but also to many teachers. Thirdly, as things are at present, the supply of tea. chers able to furnish higher forms of training is very limited. So long as the mass of students think mainly, if not solely, of passing examinations and thereby getting a Government job, the supply of really capable teachers of a high grade will always be small. The present system, in fact, involves a very vicious circle. The existing university methods and ideals are not such as to turn out a sufficient number of really high class university teachers, but until the Universities can produce teachers of this class in adequate num. bers a real reform of university methods and the attainment of higher ideals will remain extraordinarily difficult. The way out of the impasse is, it seems to me, to encourage, as much as possible, the migration of promising graduates to European centres of learning where they can acquaint themselves at first hand with modern methods and, after undergoing training in the West, can return to India and endeavour to put in practice what they have assimilated. Lastly, if opportunities of obtaining the highest training are to be afforded, much more money will have to be spent on equipment, buildings, and, to a certain extent, on salaries. |