Puslapio vaizdai
PDF
„ePub“

Assigns the difficulties of Government in Lower Can-

ada chiefly to the preponderance of French ideas and

to the weakness of the Executive. The whole policy

of the British Government has been to perpetuate the

differences of religion, laws and language, which are

the great connecting links between a Government and

its subjects. The result has been to keep the people

French and to accentuate the antipathy between them

and the English. The Canadian population must be

"overwhelmed and sunk" by English Protestants—i.e.

settlers from the United States, of whose capacities

for becoming loyal subjects he has no fear.

United States never liked a nation of Frenchmen to

their north and the introduction of such settlers would

tend to satisfy their ideas and to promote commercial

activities. At any rate, they would be of English

descent and the risk in attempting to assimilate them

would not be as great as the present risks in Lower

Canada. All tenures ought to be changed into free

and common soccage. No hopes of counteracting

French ideas can be entertained from an ignorant,

priest-guided Assembly. The future may contain a

better system, but the needs are immediate. For these

needs an "incorporate union" of the two Provinces

seems advisable. It would increase the English_in_the
Assembly, and the number of members from Lower
Canada might be reduced, and thus the influence of
the clergy diminished. Commerce would increase, and
inter-provincial jealousies tend to disappear.
Governor must exercise ecclesiastical patronage in
Roman Catholic parishes. Reasons given for the legal-
ity of such an exercise. Education must be rescued
from clerical influences and placed under the Govern-
ment, and the public press must be regulated and
controlled.

[merged small][ocr errors]

The

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

The reasons which led to the division of the Province

are not materially changed, so that their validity can
still be claimed for the continuance of the present
scheme; no reasons, however, against union if for the
benefit of the colony and of England. Generally speak-
ing, he sees no reason for believing union necessary.
If the revenue disputes between the Provinces could
be settled by union, well and good; but he sees no
reason to believe that they could. Nor would a union
help the Government in its financial disputes with the
House of Assembly in Lower Canada. Even were the
members of the Upper Canadian House united with
those of Lower Canada, they would be only a minority,
and by no assurances a unanimous minority in uni-
form support of the Executive. A union might doubt-
lessly be beneficial for ultimate good, but the question
is a pressing practical one, and a union does not at
present seem to offer any hope for betterment.

XCI. Papineau to R. J. Wilmot, December 16, 1822

Union is detested by the French Canadians, whose

loyalty he defends.

XCII. Petition from Montreal for Union, December, 1822

Proposal welcome, as petitioners are British in the

midst of a population still overwhelmingly "foreign,"

which controls the House of Assembly to the detri-

« AnkstesnisTęsti »