The reasons which led to the division of the Province
are not materially changed, so that their validity can
still be claimed for the continuance of the present
scheme; no reasons, however, against union if for the
benefit of the colony and of England. Generally speak-
ing, he sees no reason for believing union necessary.
If the revenue disputes between the Provinces could
be settled by union, well and good; but he sees no
reason to believe that they could. Nor would a union
help the Government in its financial disputes with the
House of Assembly in Lower Canada. Even were the
members of the Upper Canadian House united with
those of Lower Canada, they would be only a minority,
and by no assurances a unanimous minority in uni-
form support of the Executive. A union might doubt-
lessly be beneficial for ultimate good, but the question
is a pressing practical one, and a union does not at
present seem to offer any hope for betterment.
XCI. Papineau to R. J. Wilmot, December 16, 1822
Union is detested by the French Canadians, whose
loyalty he defends.
XCII. Petition from Montreal for Union, December, 1822
Proposal welcome, as petitioners are British in the
midst of a population still overwhelmingly "foreign,"
which controls the House of Assembly to the detri-