Puslapio vaizdai
PDF
„ePub“

1817.

Duvall

V.

Craig.

then were, and for ever after should be, free of and from all former and other gifts, bargains, sales, dower, right and title of dower, judgments, executions, titles, troubles, charges, and incumbrances whatsoever done, or suffered to be done by them, the said John Craig, and Sarah his wife, and Robert Johnson, and Elijah Craig, trustees for the said John Craig, as by the said indenture will more at large appear. And the said William, in fact, saith, that the premises before mentioned were not, then and there, free of and from all former gifts, grants, bargains, sales, titles, troubles, charges, and incumbrances whatsoever done and suffered to be done by the said John Craig, and Sarah his wife, and Robert Johnson and Elijah Craig, trustees to the said John Craig. But, on the contrary, the said John Craig and Robert Johnson, theretofore, to wit, on the 11th day of May, 1785, assigned the place and certificate of survey of said land to a certain John Hawkins Craig, by virtue of which said assignment, Patrick Henry, governor of the commonwealth of Virginia, granted the said land to said John Hawkins Craig, and his heirs for ever, by letters patent, dated the 16th day of September, 1785, and now here shown to the court, the date whereof is the day and year aforesaid, which said patent to the said John Hawkins Craig, on the day and year first aforesaid, at the district aforesaid, was in full force and virtue, contrary to the covenant aforesaid, by reason of which said assignment, patent, and incumbrance, the said William hath been prevented from having and enjoying all or any part of the premises above men

tioned. And thereupon the said William further saith, that the defendants aforesaid, although often requested, have not kept and performed their covenant aforesaid, &c. To which declaration there was a general demurrer, and joinder in demurrer, and a judgment thereupon in the circuit court for the defendants.

The indenture referred to in the plaintiff's declaration is in the following words: "This indenture, made this 28th day of February, 1795, between John Craig, and Sarah, his wife, and Robert Johnson and Elijah Craig, trustees for the said John Craig, all of the state of Kentucky, of the one part, and William Duvall of the city of Richmond, and state of Virginia, of the other part, witnesseth, that the said John Craig, for and in consideration of the sum of two thousand pounds, current money of Kentucky, to him, the said John Craig, in hand paid, the receipt whereof they do hereby acknowledge and for ever acquit and discharge the said William Duvall, his heirs, executors, and administrators, have granted, bargained and sold, aliened and confirmed, and by these presents do grant, bargain and sell, alien and confirm, unto the said William Duvall, his heirs and assigns for ever, a certain tract of land lying and being in the state of Kentucky, and now county of Scott, formerly Fayette, on the waters of the Ohio river, below the Big Bone lick creek, it being the same lands that the said John Craig covenanted by a writing obligatory, sealed with his seal, and dated the second day of December, 1788, to convey to Samuel M'Craw, of the city of Rich

[blocks in formation]

1817.

Duvall

V.

Craig.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

mond, and which said writing the said Samuel M'Craw, on the back thereof, endorsed and transferred the same on the 27th day of February, 1789, to William Reynolds, and which is bounded as follows: beginning at a poplar and small ash corner, to William Bledsoe, about thirty miles nearly a south course from the mouth of Licking; thence S. 15, E. 520 poles with the said Bledsoe's line, crossing four branches to an ash and beech; thence S. 75, W. 150 poles, to a hickory and beech; thence S. 15, E. 400 poles, crossing a branch to a sugar tree and beech, near a branch; thence S. 75. W. 87 poles, to three beeches, corner to Robert Sanders; thence with his line S. 15 E. 600 poles, crossing two branches to a poplar and sugar tree; thence S. 60 poles to a sugar tree and beech; thence west 2174 poles, crossing five branches to a large black walnut; thence north 1580 poles, crossing a large creek and four branches to a sugar tree and ash; thence E. 2006 poles, crossing five branches to the beginning; containing twenty thousand four hundred and forty acres, together with the improvements, water-courses, profits and appurtenances whatsoever to the same belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, property, and demand, of them, the said John Craig, and Sarah, his wife, and Robert Johnson, and Elijah Craig, trustees for the said John Craig, of, in, and to the same, to have and to hold the land hereby conveyed, with all and singular the premises and every part and parcel thereof, to the said William Duvall, his heirs and

assigns for ever, to the only proper use and behoof
of him, the said William Duvall, his heirs and assigns
for ever.
And the said John Craig, and Sarah, his
wife, and Robert Johnson and Elijah Craig, trustees
to the said John Craig, for themselves, their heirs,
executors, and administrators, do covenant, promise,
and agree,
to and with the said William Duvall, his
heirs and assigns, by these presents, that the premi-
ses before mentioned now are, and for ever after
shall be, free of and from all former and other gifts,
grants, bargains, sales, dower, right, and titles of
dower, judgments, executions, title, troubles, charges,
and incumbrances whatsoever done, or suffered to
be done, by the said John Craig, and Sarah, his wife,
and Robert Johnson and Elijah Craig, trustees for
the said John Craig. And the said John Craig, and
Sarah, his wife, and Robert Johnson, and Elijah
Craig, trustees for the said John Craig, and their
heirs, all and singular the premises hereby bargain-
ed and sold, with the appurtenances, unto the said
William Duvall, his heirs and assigns, against him
the said John Craig, and Sarah, his wife, and Ro-
bert Johnson, and Elijah Craig, trustees for the
said John Craig, and their heirs, and all and every
persons whatsoever, do and will warrant and for
ever defend with this warranty, and no other, to wit,
that if the said land, or any part thereof, shall at any
time be taken by a prior legal claim, or claims, that
then and in such case they, the said John Craig, and
Sarah, his wife, and Robert Johnson, and Elijah
Craig, trustces for the said John Craig, and their
heirs, shall make good to the said William Duvall

1817.

Duvall

V.

Craig.

1817.

Duvall

V.

Craig.

Feb. 8th.

and his heirs, such part or parts so lost, by supplying to his the said William Duvall's use, other lands in fee of equal quantity and quality, to be adjudged of by two or more honest, judicious, impartial men, mutually chosen by the parties for ascertaining the same. In witness whereof the said John Craig, and Sarah, his wife, and Robert Johnson, and Elijah Craig, trustees for the said John Craig, have hereunto set their hands and seals, the date first in this indenture written.

JOHN CRAIG. (L. s.)
SARAH CRAIG. (L S.)
ROBERT JOHNSON,

Trustee for John Craig. (L. s.)
ELIJAH CRAIG.

Trustee for John Craig. (L. s.)

Signed, sealed, and deliver

ed in presence of

Charles W. Byrd.
T. S. Threshly.
Thomas Corneal.
Christopher Greenup.
Robert Saunders.
James Taylor.
Jos. Wiggleworth.
George Christy."

Mr. B. Hardin, for the plaintiff, made the following points: 1. That the variance between the writ and declaration, as to the description of the parties,

« AnkstesnisTęsti »