Puslapio vaizdai
PDF
„ePub“
[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1873, by

O. A. BROWNSON, LL.D.,

in the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington.

Stereotyped and Printed
at the New York Catholic Protectory,
West Chester, N. Y.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

BROWNSON'S

QUARTERLY REVIEW.

JANUARY, 1874.

ART. I.-An Essay in Refutation of Atheism. By O. A.
BROWNSON. Insipiens dixit in corde suo: Non est Deus.

VI.-INCONCLUSIVE PROOFS.

PHILOSOPHERS and theologians do not necessarily adduce the best possible arguments to prove their theses, and may sometimes use very weak and even inconclusive arguments. An argument for the existence of God may also seem to one mind conclusive, and the reverse to another. Men usually argue from their own point of view, and take as ultimate the principles which they have never doubted, or heard questioned, although far from being in reality ultimate, and thus take for granted what for others needs to be proved. Men also may hold the truth, be as well assured of it as they are of their own existence, even possess great good sense and sound judgment, and yet be very unskilful in defending it-utterly unable to assign good and valid reasons for it. They know they are right, but know not how to prove it.

St. Thomas, the Doctor Angelicus, maintains that the existence of God is demonstrable, not from principles really a priori or universal-for nothing can be more universal or more ultimate than God from which his existence can be concluded, since he is the first principle alike in being and in knowing-but as the cause from the effect; and this he proves by five different arguments: The first is drawn from the empirical fact of motion and the necessity of a first mover, not Summa," pars prima, quæst. 1, art. 2 et 3.

[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

1

« AnkstesnisTęsti »